- 13 - approach of estimating the cost to complete and the reimbursement of part of that cost have no meaningful relationship to decedent’s asset--the partially completed residence. At the date of death, the estate had no right to receive insurance reimbursement and no obligation to pay for the completion of the residence. For that reason, we sustain respondent’s determination that the gross estate be increased by $122,4006. Next, we consider respondent’s determination that the incomplete residence should be valued by considering its value if finished. From respondent’s perspective, decedent had a contract right or chose in action that was worth, at very least, the difference between the incomplete structure and its ultimate selling value. The estate reported the value of the incomplete structure at $612,000, the value set forth in the appraisal attached to the estate’s return. The appraisal utilized a cost- per-square-foot approach to project the completed value of the then 57-percent completed residence at $1,032,000. Appropriately, the appraiser’s cost approach did not rely on the actual cost, which was more than the cost to build a contemporary residence and did not comport with fair market values of comparable residences. The appraiser’s valuation was 6 The $122,400 increase in the gross estate is a net result of the disallowance of the amount claimed as due to the residential contractor and the removal from the gross estate of the amount included as possible recovery from the insurance company.Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011