Estate of Mary B. Bull - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          approach of estimating the cost to complete and the reimbursement           
          of part of that cost have no meaningful relationship to                     
          decedent’s asset--the partially completed residence.  At the date           
          of death, the estate had no right to receive insurance                      
          reimbursement and no obligation to pay for the completion of the            
          residence.  For that reason, we sustain respondent’s                        
          determination that the gross estate be increased by $122,4006.              
               Next, we consider respondent’s determination that the                  
          incomplete residence should be valued by considering its value if           
          finished.  From respondent’s perspective, decedent had a contract           
          right or chose in action that was worth, at very least, the                 
          difference between the incomplete structure and its ultimate                
          selling value.  The estate reported the value of the incomplete             
          structure at $612,000, the value set forth in the appraisal                 
          attached to the estate’s return.  The appraisal utilized a cost-            
          per-square-foot approach to project the completed value of the              
          then 57-percent completed residence at $1,032,000.                          
          Appropriately, the appraiser’s cost approach did not rely on the            
          actual cost, which was more than the cost to build a contemporary           
          residence and did not comport with fair market values of                    
          comparable residences.  The appraiser’s valuation was                       


               6 The $122,400 increase in the gross estate is a net result            
          of the disallowance of the amount claimed as due to the                     
          residential contractor and the removal from the gross estate of             
          the amount included as possible recovery from the insurance                 
          company.                                                                    





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011