Thomas W. Burton - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         
          that he had a separate card for personal use.  The charges on the           
          MBNA statements are for business meals, as we have previously               
          determined, cellular phone, gas, and other such items.  However,            
          there are some charges that may or may not be business related.             
          Petitioner's bookkeeper testified that she actually generated all           
          the checks.  We found her to be a credible witness.                         
               Petitioner had a balance of more than $37,000 in his MBNA              
          credit card account on January 1, 1995.  Petitioner paid a total            
          of $33,715 to MBNA in 1995.  We believe that many of the charges            
          on the MBNA credit card account were for business expenses under            
          section 162 and that interest was paid in 1995, as well as much             
          of the debt.  However, there is no evidence that $19,113 of the             
          $33,715 paid to MBNA was for interest, not debt.  Moreover,                 
          respondent allowed petitioner an interest deduction of $7,000.              
          This amount roughly corresponds to 16.9 percent interest, the               
          interest rate on the MBNA card, applied to an average balance of            
          $37,000 for one year.  Because petitioner was carrying the                  
          $37,000 balance in the prior year and was making minimal                    
          payments, it is likely that additional interest accumulated which           
          was paid off in 1995 when petitioner made the larger payments to            
          MBNA.  Accordingly, under Cohan v. Commissioner, supra, we allow            
          petitioner to deduct $2,000 of interest in addition to the amount           
          allowed by respondent and sustain respondent's disallowance to              
          the extent of $17,113.                                                      
               Petitioner also filed a Schedule F for an apple and timber             
          farm located on Palomar Mountain.  The farm was acquired by                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011