Caralan Trust, et al. - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          requested, we believe that respondent’s concession eliminates any           
          deficiencies or section 6662(a) penalties with respect to the               
          trusts.  We impose no penalties under section 6673(a)(1) against            
          the trusts.  (We have imposed substantial penalties under that              
          section against the    J. and C. Shirleys, which should serve as            
          a deterrent to them again trying to avoid tax as they have done             
          here.)                                                                      
          Remaining Issues                                                            
               The remaining issues concern the J. and C. Shirleys.  Those            
          issues are as follows:                                                      
               Whether the J. Shirleys understated their gross income for             
          1995 by omitting (1) $179,791 of gross receipts reported by                 
          Alexion Trust and (2) $4 of interest and $42,000 of gross income            
          reported by Caralan Trust.                                                  
               Whether, for 1995, the J. Shirleys are entitled to deduct              
          $19,896 of depreciation apportioned to them by Caralan Trust.               
               Whether the J. Shirleys are liable for self-employment tax             
          for 1995 allocable to Joseph Shirley (and are entitled to a                 
          related deduction) on account of the omitted gross receipts of              
          $179,791.3                                                                  


               3  The amount of petitioners’ liability for self-employment            
          tax and the amount of the deduction under sec. 164(f) to which              
          petitioners are entitled are computational matters, the                     
          resolution of which will depend upon our disposition of the other           
          issues.  The J. Shirleys have not separately challenged such                
          liability and deduction, and we shall not further discuss those             
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011