- 20 - It apportioned the depreciation deduction it had computed to the J. Shirleys. The J. Shirleys reported as gross income $4 of interest and $13,749 of “NonPassive Income”, both from Caralan Trust, and claimed a depreciation deduction of $19,896, on account of the depreciation deduction apportioned to them by the Caralan Trust. Respondent determined a deficiency in the J. Shirleys’ tax by notice dated June 1, 1999 (the J. Shirleys’ notice). Among the adjustments giving rise to that determination are positive adjustments to the J. Shirleys’ gross income of (1) $4 and $42,000 on account of such amounts of interest and gross income, respectively, of Caralan Trust’s omitted from their gross income and (2) $179,791 on account of such amount of gross receipts of Alexion Trust’s omitted from their gross income. Respondent now concedes all of the first two adjustments and $13,749 of the third adjustment. Respondent concedes the first adjustment because the J. Shirleys reported the $4 of interest attributed to them from Caralan Trust. Respondent also concedes the $42,000 of gross income he attributed to the J. Shirleys from Caralan Trust. Respondent does so based on his attribution to the J. Shirleys of Alexion Trust’s gross receipts of $179,791. Such gross receipts, after the deduction of certain expenses (disallowed by respondent), including $42,000 of rent paid to Caralan Trust, were, in the amount of $101,437, treated by Alexion Trust as aPage: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011