Chrysler Corporation - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          way of the tax deductions claimed for the same shares when                  
          contributed to the ESOT.  The approximate $328 million deduction            
          was not taken for financial accounting purposes.  For those                 
          purposes, Chrysler reported the redemption as a purchase of                 
          treasury stock.                                                             
                                     Discussion                                       
               We must decide whether Chrysler may deduct the costs                   
          (redemption price and related expenses) which it incurred to                
          redeem its common stock upon termination of the ESOP.  Respondent           
          moves the Court to decide this issue by way of partial summary              
          judgment, arguing that a firmly established body of law holds               
          that a corporation may not deduct the costs which it incurs to              
          redeem its stock.  Petitioner objects to respondent’s motion.               
          Petitioner asserts that it may deduct its costs as personal                 
          service compensation or, alternatively, as a financing expense.             
          Petitioner argues as to its primary assertion that material facts           
          are still in dispute which will establish that Chrysler redeemed            
          its common stock from the ESOT intending to compensate the                  
          employees for their personal services.  Petitioner argues as to             
          its alternative assertion that material facts are still in                  
          dispute which will establish that it redeemed its common stock              
          from the ESOT as a financing expense.                                       
               Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and                
          avoid unnecessary and expensive trials of phantom factual issues.           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011