- 14 - (2d Cir. 1977), the corporation redeemed an employee’s stock as part of terminating his employment, which was done in order to extricate the corporation from an unfavorable financial and management situation. We found that the “origin and nature of the [redemption] payment was a capital transaction” and, relying upon the cases of Gilmore, Woodward, and Hilton, rejected the corporation’s attempt to deduct that payment. We declined to accept the taxpayer’s argument that the amount paid to the disaffected employee over and above the value of the stock he surrendered was deductible compensation. We found that any compensatory aspect of the transaction was inseparable from the capital aspect–-the elimination of his equity interest. We explained that “there is nothing in the record to indicate that * * * [the employee] would have been paid anything * * * had he wished to retain his * * * shares”. We distinguished Five Star Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, supra, which had allowed a deduction of redemption payments, on the basis of our finding that the redemption in the Harder Servs., Inc. case was not necessary to preserve the corporation. The Supreme Court provided a further development in Ark. Best v. Commissioner, 485 U.S. 212 (1988). There, it held that the taxpayer could not deduct as an ordinary and necessary business expense the loss it incurred on a disposition of a subsidiary’s stock, although the stock had been acquired with thePage: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011