- 20 - was “analogous either to interest paid to a seller to compensate for delay in payment of a purchase price, or to rent paid for the temporary use of income producing property.” Id. Because the payment of either interest or rent would have been taxable as ordinary income, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the $2,432,175.45 award was taxable to the corporation as ordinary income. The case of Keller St. Dev. Co. v. Commissioner, supra, is of no help to petitioner. As discussed above, the redemption payments at hand were not a substitute for wages. Those payments resulted from the demand of Chrysler’s employee/shareholders that Chrysler redeem its common stock from the ESOT at fair market value. That demand required that Chrysler pay to the employee/shareholders nothing more than they would have otherwise received had they sold their Chrysler common stock to an unrelated party on a public market. We also held in Frederick Weisman Co. v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 563 (1991), that section 311(a) precluded the deduction of amounts paid to redeem stock. Section 311(a) provides: SEC. 311(a). General Rule. -- Except as provided in [subsection] (b), * * * no gain or loss shall be recognized to a corporation on the distribution, with respect to its stock, of -- (1) its stock (or rights to acquire its stock), orPage: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011