Chrysler Corporation - Page 22




                                       - 22 -                                         
               Our holding in Frederick Weisman Co. v. Commissioner, supra,           
          is dispositive here.  Because Chrysler redeemed its common stock            
          from the employees (through the ESOP) in their capacity as                  
          shareholders, section 311(a) denies Chrysler the opportunity to             
          recognize either gain or loss on the transaction.                           
               Petitioner contends that Chrysler’s redemption of its stock            
          falls within a specific exception to the application of section             
          311(a).  We disagree.  That exception, which was in effect for              
          the subject years, was set forth in section 1.311-1(e)(1), Income           
          Tax Regs., to read as follows:                                              
                    (1) Section 311 is limited to distributions which                 
               are made by reason of the corporation-stockholder                      
               relationship. Section 311 does not apply to                            
               transactions between a corporation and a shareholder in                
               his capacity as debtor, creditor, employee, or vendee,                 
               where the fact that such debtor, creditor, employee, or                
               vendee is a shareholder is incidental to the                           
               transaction.  Thus, if the corporation receives its own                
               stock as consideration upon the sale of property by it,                
               or in satisfaction of indebtedness to it, the gain or                  
               loss resulting is to be computed in the same manner as                 
               though the payment had been made in any other                          
               property.[8]                                                           




               7(...continued)                                                        
          Commissioner, 40 T.C. 379, 387 n.5 (1963), because the parties              
          there apparently agreed that the corporation acquired its stock             
          from its shareholder in his capacity as a debtor of the                     
          corporation.                                                                
               8 Former sec. 1.311-1, Income Tax Regs., was redesignated as           
          relating to prior law and was removed from the Code of Federal              
          Regulations pursuant to T.D. 8474, 1993-1 C.B. 242.  See also               
          Notice 92-12, 1992-1 C.B. 500, 504.                                         





Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011