- 4 - only 10 beauticians2 worked for any substantial period. All of the individuals listed in the notice of determination worked for Maxi’s as beauticians for some period during 1994 and/or 1995. During the first quarter of 1994, petitioner treated the beauticians working for him as employees; i.e., petitioner withheld Federal income taxes of $1,083.82. Of these amounts, petitioner deposited $400.78 with the Government. Petitioner did not file Form 940, Employer’s Annual Federal Unemployment (FUTA) Tax Return, or Form 941, Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return, for any period during the years at issue. For the remaining 1994 tax year and for the entire 1995 tax year, petitioner did not withhold any Federal income taxes, including employment taxes3 from amounts paid to the beauticians. The former owner of the hair salon had treated beauticians working for the salon as employees for Federal tax purposes. Petitioner’s accountant, Fred C. Brents (Mr. Brents), prepared Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, for beauticians 2 These beauticians are identified in the notice of determination. Although the identity of beauticians named in the notice of determination, petitioner’s payroll records, and the Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, are inconsistent, petitioner does not contest the identity of these individuals listed in the notice of determination, and, therefore, we accept respondent’s identification in the notice of determination. See Rule 34(b)(5). 3 For convenience, the term “employment taxes” refers to taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), secs. 3101-3125, the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA), secs. 3301- 3311, and income tax withholding, secs. 3401-3406 and 3509.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011