- 7 - available during Maxi’s normal business hours to accommodate walk-in customers. Beauticians were not precluded from working for other salons. Petitioner could terminate a beautician’s services at any time, and, on a few occasions, beauticians were dismissed for providing poor service. Petitioner required all beauticians to share reception duties, as needed. Health and disability insurance benefits were not provided by petitioner. Petitioner provided dental insurance for the first quarter of 1994, although it was the beautician’s responsibility to maintain premium payments thereafter. Vacation and sick days were unpaid. In the notice of determination respondent determined that the beauticians listed therein were employees of Maxi’s, and that petitioner was not entitled to relief under section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978. Respondent attached to the notice of determination an Agreement to Assessment and Collection of Additional Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment (Excise or Employment Tax) (Form 2504) in which respondent proposed that petitioner consent to immediate assessment and collection of $12,716.19 in taxes, and $4,375.66 in section 6651(a)(1) and 6656(a) additions to tax, consisting of the following amounts:Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011