- 6 - services to petitioner. A typical contract purportedly set a flat fee for rental of a chair; however, according to petitioner’s records, chair rental amounts fluctuated month-to- month based upon the dollar amount of services rendered by each beautician. Petitioner required beauticians to have a beautician license issued by the State of Washington prior to hiring. He did not train or instruct beauticians how to cut or style hair. Petitioner provided all equipment and beauty supplies or products used by beauticians. On occasion a beautician brought and used his or her own clippers, combs, brushes, etc.; however, it was not required for a beautician to supply these items. If a beautician modified a work station, petitioner would bear the costs of such modification. Petitioner set the base fee for all services provided by the beauticians. Beauticians were required to use a common cash register and to submit daily reports showing the fees collected during the day. All credit card and check payments for services, regardless of which beautician provided the services, were payable to “C&M Enterprises”, a business owned and operated by petitioner and his wife. Petitioner set Maxi’s hours of operation; however, some beauticians were given keys to provide services outside of normal business hours. Beauticians generally set their own schedule, but petitioner required beauticians to bePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011