Michael E. and Johanna S. Davis - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined that petitioners were liable for the             
          following additions to tax for the years 1982, 1983, 1984, and              
          1985:                                                                       

                         Additions to Tax                                             
               Year      Sec. 6653(a)(1)     Sec. 6653(a)(2)                          
               1982           $250                *                                   
               1983           25                  **                                  
               1984           15                  ***                                 
               1985           17                  ****                                
               *    Fifty percent of the interest due on $5,000.                      
               **   Fifty percent of the interest due on $298.                        
               *** Fifty percent of the interest due on $294.                         
               **** Fifty percent of the interest due on $427.                        

               The issue for decision is whether, for 1982 through 1985,              
          petitioners are liable for the additions to tax shown above                 
          relating to their participation as a limited partner in a                   
          partnership known as Jojoba Research Partners, Hawaii (Jojoba               
          Hawaii or the partnership).                                                 
               Some of the facts were stipulated, and those facts, with the           
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by               
          reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioners'                
          legal residence was Colorado Springs, Colorado.                             
               Petitioner husband is a salesman in the telecommunications             
          industry, and petitioner wife is a homemaker.  During the years             
          at issue, petitioner husband worked in the telecommunications               
          industry, and petitioner wife worked as an administrative                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011