- 124 - condominium unit at 4107 Medical Drive on a retail basis. The reason for this in the case of the single-family houses was suggested in the memorandum of respondent's appraisers, Messrs. Dalton and Ramos, quoted above, when they stated: "Multiple sales of single-family houses were not plentiful at the date of value and at the present date they are very obscure." In effect, it appears that there was not a market for multiple sales of single-family houses in 1982 and 1983 when the properties were purchased. Furthermore, respondent used the retail value of the single-family houses and the condominium unit at 4107 Medical Drive in computing the percentages and arguing that the aggregate nonrecourse debt exceeded the value of the properties by 39.40 percent in the case of EA 83-XII and 19.53 percent in the case of EA 84-III. Respondent does not argue that the single-family houses and the condominium unit at 4107 Medical Drive should be valued on a wholesale basis. Thus, it appears that respondent agrees with petitioners that these properties should be valued on a retail basis. Accordingly, we shall review the evidence in the record to determine the retail value of the single- family houses and the condominium at 4107 Medical Drive. The partnerships purchased a total of 26 single-family houses and the condominium unit at 4107 Medical Drive. AsPage: Previous 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011