Gary Friedmann - Page 28




                                       - 28 -                                         
             listed for 1989 or 1990.  The net payments to clients in                 
             this category are as follows:                                            
                                           1989           1990                       
                  Steven Dana            $-500.00       -0-                           
                  Said Dermarkar         -0-            $-2,000.00                    
                  Carissa Drucker        -1,671.03      -4,010.00                     
                  Stewart Gleischman     -458.82        -18,740.08                    
                  Jepsco/Epstein         -4,721.00      -30,010.00                    
                  Joblon                 -0-            -1,128.13                     
                                         -7,350.85      -55,888.21                    

             The above schedule also shows that petitioner allegedly                  
             made payments to a number of clients, including his                      
             parents, that substantially exceeded the amount of fees                  
             petitioner received from those clients.  The net payments                
             to clients in this category are as follows:                              

                                         1989               1990                      
             Faith Burns          -$2,980.91          -0-                             
             Eric Friedmann             3,788.01        -$8,722.94                    
             Bill Habelow               -5,687.75       -2,350.00                     
             Jeff Kolton                3,772.00        -12,500.00                    
             Margaret Lynch             -26,697.70      -0-                           

                  Another preliminary point should be noted.  In his                  
             reply brief, petitioner implies that he was unable to                    
             produce some records necessary to substantiate the "returns              
             and allowances" reported on his returns because certain of               
             his records had been lost.  In discussing the evidence that              
             he adduced to substantiate the direct payments, petitioner               
             states that his "business records were lost when he shipped              





Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011