David R. and Darlene Funk - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          loss carryback to 1996; (g) petitioner David R. Funk received and           
          failed to include $555,508 in gross income on petitioners’ 1996             
          return which had been reported on trust income tax returns of               
          which he was grantor, relating to rental and royalty income; (h)            
          petitioner Darlene Funk received and failed to include $531,508             
          in gross income on petitioners’ 1996 return which had been                  
          reported on trust income tax returns of which she was grantor,              
          relating to rental and royalty income; (i) petitioners are liable           
          for additional self-employment tax for 1996 of $45,304; and (j)             
          the trusts created by petitioners are shams, or, in the                     
          alternative are grantor trusts, or, in the alternative that the             
          income reported by the trusts is taxable to petitioners under the           
          assignment of income doctrine.                                              
               Respondent also determined that for the year 1996                      
          petitioners are liable for an accuracy-related penalty under the            
          provisions of section 6662, computed on the full deficiency                 
          determined in the notice of deficiency.                                     
               When the petition was filed in this case on October 3, 2000,           
          petitioners resided in Rocklin, California.                                 
               In his motion to dismiss, respondent avers, inter alia:                
                    9. * * * Tax Court Rule 34(b)(5) provides that the                
               petition in a deficiency action shall also contain                     
               “[Clear] and concise lettered statements of the facts                  
               on which petitioner bases the assignments of error,                    
               except with respect to those assignments of error as to                
               which the burden of proof is on the Commissioner.”                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011