David R. and Darlene Funk - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
                    10.  The petitioners alleged in their petition no                 
               facts in support of any of their allegations of error;                 
               instead, the petitioners have alleged only “facts”                     
               which are irrelevant to their allegations of error, or                 
               are not allegations of fact but are instead allegations                
               of law and legal conclusions.                                          
                    11.  In the petition, the petitioners did not                     
               address, or allege as erroneous, any of the specific                   
               determinations of the respondent in the notice of                      
               deficiency * * *.                                                      
                    12.  In the petition, the petitioners did not                     
               allege facts regarding any of the specific                             
               determinations of the respondent in the notice of                      
               deficiency.                                                            
               Paragraph 4 of the petition in this case challenges the                
          notice of deficiency in this case as follows:                               
               (1) Respondents Notice of Deficiency claims a                          
               deficiency.  Petitioner denies having a deficiency.                    
               (2) Respondents Notice of Deficiency claims unreported                 
               and under reported income.  Petitioner denies having                   
               unreported or under reported income.  (3) Respondents                  
               IRS Form 4549A-CG, income tax examination changes,                     
               claims a tax liability.  Petitioner denies having a tax                
               liability.  (4) Respondent has failed to provide                       
               petitioners with certified assessment information as                   
               per Internal Revenue Regulation 301.6203-1.  (5)                       
               Respondent claims a deficiency, but has failed to                      
               provide petitioners with the USC Title 26 taxing statue                
               that applies.  (6) Respondent claims a deficiency, but                 
               has failed to provide petitioners with any certified                   
               facts or evidence.  (7) Respondents Notice of                          
               Deficiency is null and void as it is based on hearsay                  
               facts and evidence.  (8) Petitioner has been denied a                  
               meaningful administrative hearing where certified facts                
               or evidence from respondent was provided.  (9)                         
               Petitioners declaration, signed under penalty of                       
               perjury, is attached and made part of this matter.                     
               Attached to the petition is a Declaration of David R. Funk             
          (attached hereto as Appendix).  A substantially identical                   
          Declaration of Darlene Funk was also attached to the petition.              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011