- 7 - IRC Sec. 6212(a), in General, states--If the Secretary determines that there is a deficiency in respect of any tax imposed by subtitles A or B or chapter 41, 42, 43, or 44 he is authorized to send notice of such deficiency to the taxpayer by certified mail or registered mail. The petitioner interprets both of these sections to mean, the respondent will identify the IRC section that was relied on to “determine” the “deficiency.” For a tax to be imposed under subtitle A or B, the respondent must identify the section relied on. Neither the respondent, and/or the District Director who rubber stamped her signature to the Notice of Deficiency, have identified the IRC section, under USC Title 26, Subtitle A or B, that was relied on to claim a tax due (liability). If respondent can not identify any section under subtitle A or B, then respondents determination and deficiency is based on fraud. Discussion Rule 34(b)(4) provides that a petition filed in this Court shall contain: (4) Clear and concise assignments of each and every error which the petitioner alleges to have been committed by the Commissioner in the determination of the deficiency or liability. The assignments of error shall include issues in respect of which the burden of proof is on the Commissioner. Any issue not raised in the assignments of error shall be deemed to be conceded. Each assignment of error shall be separately lettered. The petition and amended petition filed in this case do not conform with the provisions of Rule 34(b)(4) and (5). There is no assignment of error or allegation of fact to establish any justiciable claim. The petition and amended petition contains little more than unintelligible gobbledygook. We perceive no need to refute these arguments with somber reasoning and copious citation of precedent; toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011