Jack C. Goins, Sr. and Edith M. Goins - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          referee and an appeal to the Kentucky Unemployment Insurance                
          Commission, petitioner was denied benefits on the basis of                  
          insufficient base period wages.  Applying common-law factors                
          used in making such determinations, the Kentucky Unemployment               
          Insurance Commission found that “the services performed by * * *            
          [petitioner for the DOI] were performed as an independent                   
          contractor” and that petitioner “was not an employee of” the DOI.           
               The decision of the Kentucky Unemployment Insurance                    
          Commission is based in part upon petitioner’s employment                    
          relationship with the DOI during the years in issue.  For each of           
          those years the terms of that relationship are set forth in a               
          personal service contract.  Among other things, each contract               
          provides for:  (1) A term of 1 year, beginning on July 1 and                
          ending on June 30; (2) petitioner’s maximum annual fees for                 
          services computed with reference to the maximum set on a daily              
          basis; and (3) reimbursement for traveling costs including a                
          fixed rate per diem amount depending, in part, upon distance                
          traveled.  Each contract specifically provides:                             
               The parties are cognizant that the State is liable for                 
               Social Security employer’s contributions and for making                
               Social Security withholdings pursuant to 42 U.S. Code,                 
               Section 418 [Section 218 of the Social Security Act],                  
               relative to the compensation of the Second Party for                   
               this contract.                                                         











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011