- 12 - These common-law rules take into account the following factors: (1) The degree of control exercised by the principal, (2) which party invests in work facilities used by the individual, (3) the opportunity of the individual for profit or loss, (4) whether the principal can discharge the individual, (5) whether the work is part of the principal's regular business, (6) the permanency of the relationship, and (7) the relationship the parties believed they were creating. See Weber v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 378, 387 (1994), affd. per curiam 60 F.3d 1104 (4th Cir. 1995). No single factor dictates the outcome. All the facts and circumstances should be considered. See id. In this case, the Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission applied the above factors and found that the services performed by petitioner for the DOI were performed as an independent contractor. After examining all the facts and circumstances in this case, we agree with the Commission’s determination and find that, for purposes of section 62, petitioner was an independent contractor during the years in issue. Accordingly, petitioner’s allowable business expense deductions, as set forth above, are properly deducted on a Schedule C. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011