F. Browne Gregg, Sr., and Juanita O. Gregg - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          104(a)(2), the Supreme Court in Schleier had concluded that                 
          although the taxpayer’s “unlawful termination may have caused him           
          some pain, suffering and emotional distress such as that suffered           
          by an automobile accident victim, no personal injury had been               
          suffered affecting the amount of back wages recovered.”  Id. at             
          1267 (emphasis added).  The Court of Appeals further noted that             
          in O’Gilvie v. United States, 519 U.S. 79 (1996), the Supreme               
          Court had revisited, in the context of an award of punitive                 
          damages, the causal analysis mandated by Schleier and had                   
          rejected a “but-for” causal analysis in favor of an                         
          “interpretation under which only those damages were excludable              
          that were awarded ‘by reason of’ or ‘because of’ the personal               
          injuries.”  Fabry v. Commissioner, 223 F.3d at 1269 n.25.  The              
          Court of Appeals stated:                                                    
               O’Gilvie is consistent with Schleier because punitive                  
               damages do not bear the direct causal link with the                    
               victim’s personal injury since the amount of punitive                  
               damages awarded generally varies positively with the                   
               degree of the tortfeasor’s conduct, not with the extent                
               of the injury sustained.  * * *  [Id. at 1270 n.25;                    
               emphasis added.]                                                       
               On the basis of the Court of Appeals’ analysis in Fabry of             
          these Supreme Court precedents, then, it would appear that the              
          “direct causal link” between damages awarded and personal                   
          injuries sustained depends, at least in part, on whether personal           
          injuries sustained affected the amount of damages received.  As             
          previously discussed, petitioners have failed to show that the              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011