- 12 - On audit, petitioners substantiated $8,527 and $4,305 of legal and professional expenses for 1990 and 1991, respectively. In the notice of deficiency, respondent allowed petitioners to deduct $4,647 and $3,000 of the substantiated expenses for 1990 and 1991, respectively, on the Schedules C. Respondent also allowed petitioners to deduct $3,880 and $1,305 of the substantiated expenses for 1990 and 1991, respectively, on their Schedules A, subject to the statutory limitations, as tax preparation fees. Respondent disallowed $96 of the amount claimed for 1990 as unsubstantiated expenses. Travel Expenses On the Schedules C for 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993, petitioner claimed travel expenses of $4,830, $4,326, $2,721, $3,532, and $3,686, respectively. On audit, respondent determined that petitioners had substantiated travel expenses of $2,525, $4,312, $2,742, $3,479, and $2,870 for 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993, respectively. Respondent determined further that some of the substantiated travel expenses did not relate to petitioner’s law practice. From January 26 through February 4, 1989, petitioner took a trip to Minnesota. The airfare for that trip was $298. On audit, respondent determined that the trip was not related to petitioner’s law practice but, instead, was related to his investments.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011