Richard and Judith Haeder - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
               On audit, petitioners substantiated $8,527 and $4,305 of               
          legal and professional expenses for 1990 and 1991, respectively.            
          In the notice of deficiency, respondent allowed petitioners to              
          deduct $4,647 and $3,000 of the substantiated expenses for 1990             
          and 1991, respectively, on the Schedules C.  Respondent also                
          allowed petitioners to deduct $3,880 and $1,305 of the                      
          substantiated expenses for 1990 and 1991, respectively, on their            
          Schedules A, subject to the statutory limitations, as tax                   
          preparation fees.  Respondent disallowed $96 of the amount                  
          claimed for 1990 as unsubstantiated expenses.                               
          Travel Expenses                                                             
               On the Schedules C for 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993,               
          petitioner claimed travel expenses of $4,830, $4,326, $2,721,               
          $3,532, and $3,686, respectively.  On audit, respondent                     
          determined that petitioners had substantiated travel expenses of            
          $2,525, $4,312, $2,742, $3,479, and $2,870 for 1989, 1990, 1991,            
          1992, and 1993, respectively.  Respondent determined further that           
          some of the substantiated travel expenses did not relate to                 
          petitioner’s law practice.                                                  
               From January 26 through February 4, 1989, petitioner took a            
          trip to Minnesota.  The airfare for that trip was $298.  On                 
          audit, respondent determined that the trip was not related to               
          petitioner’s law practice but, instead, was related to his                  
          investments.                                                                






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011