- 19 - or was expended for the purpose designated and that petitioner had not substantiated the amount. Additional Business Income In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that during 1989 petitioner received business income of $1,085 from a litigation matter, which petitioners failed to include on their return for that year. Respondent increased petitioner’s income accordingly. Income From Prizes During November 1989, petitioner won a laptop computer from JMS Inc., d.b.a. Computerland (Computerland). Petitioner, however, did not want the computer and refused to accept it. Instead of the computer, Computerland gave petitioner a store credit. Petitioners did not include any income attributable to the Computerland prize on their Federal income tax return for 1989. In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that during 1989 petitioners received income attributable to the Computerland prize of $2,223. Respondent increased petitioners’ income for that year accordingly. Dividend Income Respondent determined that for 1992 petitioners overstated income from dividends by $8,732. Respondent reduced petitioners’ income for that year accordingly.Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011