- 26 - is no evidence that these notes were subordinate to the notes payable to decedent and Hoffman Associates. The main asset of Clubside was the Cathead property, and Clubside’s available cash was negligible as of the valuation date. However, as of the valuation date, Clubside’s asset-to-liability ratio was approximately 3 to 1, and Clubside had the option to prepay the notes in full or in part, without penalty, at any time. There is no evidence in the record to indicate that the promissory notes would not be honored by Clubside as of the date of maturity. We believe that a willing buyer would consider all these factors in determining an appropriate rate of return on an investment of this nature. After reviewing the reports and testimony of both parties’ experts, we agree with respondent that a 12.5-percent rate is appropriate and hold that the values of the promissory notes payable to decedent and Hoffman Associates were $56,664 and $91,070, respectively, as of the valuation date. 2. Value of 27.5-Percent Interest in Clubside Partnership At the time of her death, decedent held a 27.5-percent interest in Clubside. Respondent determined that decedent’s interest was worth $338,000 as of the valuation date. The estate determined that decedent’s interest was worth $290,582 as of the valuation date.20 20At trial, Mr. Bishop admitted that he erred in his analysis because he did not properly account for the value of the (continued...)Page: Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011