- 8 - in excluding from gross income the amounts that should have been reported on the form; see, e.g., Neely v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 934, 952 (1985); Fairchild v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-237; Rivera v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-625; Vaughn v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-317, affd. without published opinion 15 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir. 1993). Petitioner has failed to show that the settlement proceeds fall within the purview of any provision of the Code or of law excluding them from gross income. Therefore, the $12,500 that he actually received from Mr. Davis is includable in his gross income. We now address the $2,500 settlement payment to which petitioner was entitled, but which he never actually received. A taxpayer who reports income under the cash method of accounting must report income for the taxable year when actually or constructively received. Sec. 1.451-1(a), Income Tax Regs. Income * * * is constructively received by * * * [a taxpayer] in the taxable year during which it is credited to his account, set apart for him, or otherwise made available so that he may draw upon it at any time, or so that he could have drawn upon it during the taxable year if notice of intention to withdraw had been given. However, income is not constructively received if the taxpayer’s control of its receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions. * * * Sec. 1.451-2(a), Income Tax Regs. Under the constructive- receipt doctrine, a taxpayer recognizes income when the taxpayer has an unqualified, vested right to receive immediate payment. Martin v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 814, 823 (1991). “Generally,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011