- 11 - requests by telling petitioner that his money was being used to cover the costs in the store manager case. Petitioner’s requests for the $2,500 balance of the settlement due to him all were oral. He never wrote to Mr. Davis to request payment of these funds. Mr. Davis asserts that petitioner agreed that he should retain $2,500 of the amount due to petitioner from settlement of the lab manager case to help fund the litigation of the store manager case. Mr. Davis explained that he was “ready, willing and able” to send petitioner his $2,500 if petitioner sent him a letter requesting the money and a release of any claim for compensation for assisting with the store manager case. Mr. Davis acknowledges that he and petitioner never entered into a written agreement allowing Mr. Davis to retain the $2,500 due to petitioner. The record here shows that petitioner was entitled to a settlement payment of $15,000 and that the entire amount was paid to petitioner’s attorney, Mr. Davis. The attorney paid $12,500 to petitioner and retained $2,500. He explained to petitioner that petitioner had “an additional $2,500 coming from costs to be recovered” and that petitioner was a participant in the store manager case. At the time of this explanation, the entire $15,000 amount already had been paid to the attorney. The settlement agreement included a general release of allPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011