- 9 - there must be an amount that is immediately due and owing that the obligor is ready, willing, and able to pay.” Childs v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 634, 654 (1994), affd. without published opinion 89 F.3d 856 (11th Cir. 1996). The amount owed must either be credited to the taxpayer or set aside for the taxpayer so that the taxpayer has an unrestricted right to receive it immediately, and the taxpayer being aware of these facts, declines to accept the payment. Id. The constructive-receipt doctrine precludes the taxpayer from deliberately turning his back upon income otherwise available. Martin v. Commissioner, supra. The determination whether a taxpayer has constructively received income is essentially a question of fact. Childs v. Commissioner, supra at 654. We have long held that the doctrine of constructive receipt is to be applied sparingly. The doctrine is only to be invoked when the taxpayer has an unrestricted right to receive payment of money that is available to him. Furstenberg v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 755, 792-793 (1984); Basila v. Commissioner, 36 T.C. 111, 115-116 (1961) (citing Gullett v. Commissioner, 31 B.T.A. 1067, 1069 (1935)). Generally, receipt of payment by an agent is constructive receipt by the principal. Md. Cas. Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 342, 346-347 (1920); Burkes v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-61. An exception to the general rule exists if there is anPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011