- 11 - Gifts for the use of undesignated members of a large group are not considered indirect gifts to individuals; thus, one distinguishing factor lies in the provider’s knowledge about the ultimate recipient of the gift. But the heart of the distinction being made is that payments for gifts to be made by and in the sole discretion of some other business entity are not treated as “gifts to individuals” by the payor in the first instance. * * * [World Wide Agency, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1981-419.] Applying these precepts to the matter at hand, we conclude that petitioners have failed to establish that the gift certificates were given to undesignated and unknown members of a large group in the sole discretion of the receiving entity. The record before us lists only the name of each corporate recipient and the corresponding sales volume generated by that customer. We thus are unable to determine that the entities were not small, closely held corporations with few employees. Even a significant sales volume tells us little about the underlying corporate structure or relationships. We also note that R&J chose to give a second certificate to 9 of the 28 enumerated customers for reasons that apparently bear no correlation to sales volume. Those customers ranked first, fourth, fifth, seventh, eleventh, fifteenth, seventeenth, twenty-second, and twenty-third in terms of decreasing sales volumes were selected to receive two certificates. This could support an inference that R&J expected or intended particular persons to be awarded the gift certificates and felt that two individuals in certainPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011