Gabriel Lopez - Page 8




                                                - 8 -                                                  
            underpayment for each taxable year in issue was due to fraud.                              
            Profl. Servs. v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 888, 930 (1982).  The                               
            existence of fraud is a question of fact to be resolved from the                           
            entire record.  Gajewski v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 181, 199                                 
            (1976), affd. without published opinion 578 F.2d 1383 (8th Cir.                            
            1978).  Because direct proof of a taxpayer's intent is rarely                              
            available, fraud may be proven by circumstantial evidence, and                             
            reasonable inferences may be drawn from the relevant facts.                                
            Spies v. United States, 317 U.S. 492, 499 (1943); Stephenson v.                            
            Commissioner, 79 T.C. 995, 1006 (1982), affd. 748 F.2d 331 (6th                            
            Cir. 1984).  Mere suspicion, however, does not prove fraud.                                
            Cirillo v. Commissioner, 314 F.2d 478, 482 (3d Cir. 1963), affg.                           
            in part and revg. in part T.C. Memo. 1961-192; Katz v.                                     
            Commissioner, 90 T.C. 1130, 1144 (1988); Shaw v. Commissioner, 27                          
            T.C. 561, 569-570 (1956), affd. 252 F.2d 681 (6th Cir. 1958).                              
                  Over the years, courts have developed a nonexclusive list of                         
            factors that demonstrate fraudulent intent.  These badges of                               
            fraud include:  (1) Understating income, (2) maintaining                                   
            inadequate records, (3) implausible or inconsistent explanations                           
            of behavior, (4) concealment of income or assets, (5) failing to                           
            cooperate with tax authorities, (6) engaging in illegal                                    
            activities, (7) an intent to mislead which may be inferred from a                          
            pattern of conduct, (8) lack of credibility of the taxpayer's                              
            testimony, (9) filing false documents, (10) failing to file tax                            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011