- 10 - of fraud. Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 139 (1954). Petitioner did not report any of his income for the years in issue until September 24, 1993. Thus, petitioner consistently and substantially understated his income during the years in issue by claiming exempt status. 3. Filing False Forms W-4 Filing false Forms W-4 may be evidence of fraud and an affirmative act of evasion. United States v. Mal, 942 F.2d 682, 685 (9th Cir. 1991); Bradford v. Commissioner, supra at 308; Recklitis v. Commissioner, supra at 910-911; Rowlee v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1111, 1125 (1983); Stephenson v. Commissioner, supra at 1007. Petitioner filed false Forms W-4 with his employer. 4. Petitioner’s Failure To File Although failure to file tax returns, even over an extended period, may not per se establish fraud, it may be persuasive circumstantial evidence of fraud. Marsellus v. Commissioner, 544 F.2d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1977), affg. T.C. Memo. 1975-368; Stafford v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-50, affd. without published opinion 146 F.3d 868 (5th Cir. 1998); Recklitis v. Commissioner, supra at 910-911; Schiff v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-223, affd. 751 F.2d 116 (2d Cir. 1984). The failure to file returns is particularly persuasive evidence when thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011