David J. Lychuk and Mary K. Lychuk, et al. - Page 49




                                       - 46 -                                         
          diligence costs of $23,700, and officers’ salaries of $150,000              
          which respondent had determined were attributable to the                    
          transaction.  Most ($83,450) of the investigatory costs related             
          to services rendered by a law firm, before Davenport agreed to              
          participate in the transaction.  The remaining ($4,120)                     
          investigatory costs related to services performed by the law firm           
          in investigating whether, after the transaction, Norwest’s                  
          director and officer liability coverage would protect Davenport’s           
          directors and officers for acts and omissions occurring before              
          the transaction.  The due diligence costs related to services               
          performed by the law firm in connection with Norwest’s due                  
          diligence review.  The disallowed officers’ salaries were                   
          attributable to services performed in the transaction.                      
               We held that section 162(a) did not let Davenport deduct any           
          of the disputed costs.  Our holding followed our conclusion that            
          all of the costs bore a sufficient nexus to a transaction                   
          producing a significant long-term benefit to fall within the                
          rules of capitalization as set forth primarily in INDOPCO, Inc.             
          v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79 (1992).  Upon appeal, the                      
          Commissioner conceded that section 162(a) allowed Davenport to              
          deduct the investigatory costs of $83,450 because they were                 
          attributable to the investigatory stage of the transaction.  That           
          concession followed the Commissioner’s release of Rev. Rul. 99-             
          23, 1999-1 C.B. 998, 1000, which holds that                                 






Page:  Previous  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011