- 55 -                                         
          the contrary view.  For the reasons set forth below, we continue            
          to adhere to our view on the rules of capitalization as expressed           
          in PNC Bancorp, Inc., respectfully disagreeing with the contrary            
          view expressed by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.               
               PNC was the successor in interest to two banks                         
          (collectively, PNC) which had deducted expenditures paid to                 
          market, research, and originate loans to PNC’s customers.  These            
          expenditures included:  (1) Amounts paid to record security                 
          interests, (2) amounts paid to third parties for property                   
          reports, credit reports, and appraisals, and (3) an allocable               
          portion of salaries and benefits paid to employees for evaluating           
          a borrower’s financial condition, evaluating guaranties,                    
          collateral, and other security arrangements, negotiating loan               
          terms, preparing and processing loan documents, and closing loan            
          transactions.  PNC capitalized and amortized these costs for                
          financial accounting purposes but deducted them for Federal                 
          income tax purposes.  PNC argued that the costs were deductible             
          for tax purposes because they (1) were recurring expenses in the            
          banking business, (2) were integral to PNC’s daily operation, and           
          (3) provided PNC with only short-term benefits.                             
               We found that PNC incurred the costs to create separate and            
          distinct assets, i.e., the loans, and that the costs produced for           
          PNC long-term benefits in the form of the interest to be received           
          in later years.  The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit                 
Page:  Previous   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011