Kevin H. Motley - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          determined the following deficiencies in and additions to                   
          petitioner’s Federal income taxes:                                          
                                        Additions to Tax                              
               Year      Deficiency     Sec. 6651(a)(1)  Sec. 6654                    
               1994      $27,797        $2,113.25       $327.11                       
               1995      89,992         17,451.00    3,663.33                         
               1996      28,908         2,666.25      459.75                          
                                     Background                                       
               In the notices of deficiency, respondent determined, on the            
          basis of income reported by third-party payers, that petitioner             
          failed to report wage income, capital gains, interest income, and           
          dividend income.  Respondent also determined additions to tax for           
          failure to timely file returns and failure to make estimated tax            
          payments.                                                                   
               On June 28, 1999, petitioner invoked the jurisdiction of               
          this Court by timely filing an imperfect petition.  On July 1,              
          1999, the Court ordered petitioner to file an amended petition in           
          order to comply with the Rules of the Court as to the form and              
          content of a proper petition and enclosed the form with the                 
          order.  On September 3, 1999, petitioner filed the amended                  
          petition on the form enclosed with the Court’s July 1, 1999,                
          order.  At the time he filed the amended petition, petitioner               
          resided in Pepper Pike, Ohio.                                               
               In the petitions, petitioner averred, among other things,              
          that respondent’s determinations were erroneous “based upon the             
          actual capital gain calculation versus the use of gross proceeds            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011