- 5 - that he has the burden of production regarding the additions to tax because the examination in this case began after July 22, 1998, but claimed that he does not bear the burden of proof on any issue in this case. See Internal Revenue Service Restructuring & Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3001(c), 112 Stat. 685, 727 (providing that sec. 7491 is applicable to court proceedings arising in connection with examinations commenced after July 22, 1998); sec. 7491(a), (c). A. The Deficiencies As a general rule, the taxpayer bears the burden of proving the Commissioner's deficiency determinations incorrect. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Section 7491(a), however, provides that if a taxpayer introduces credible evidence and meets certain other prerequisites, the Commissioner shall bear the burden of proof with respect to factual issues relating to the liability of the taxpayer for a tax imposed under subtitle A or B of the Code. Petitioner failed to appear and did not introduce any evidence. Therefore, we conclude that the burden of proof is not placed on respondent pursuant to section 7491(a). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s deficiency determinations. B. Additions to Tax Section 7491(c) provides that the Commissioner shall bear the burden of production with respect to the liability of anyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011