- 8 - evidence sufficient to persuade the Court that respondent’s determination is incorrect or that an exception applies. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, supra at 115; see Higbee v. Commissioner, supra at 447. Petitioner failed to appear and did not introduce any evidence. Accordingly, on this issue, we sustain respondent’s determination. C. Conclusion We have sustained all of respondent's determinations. Therefore, we will dismiss the case and enter a decision against petitioner. Rules 123(b), 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, supra at 115. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order and decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011