Pediatric Surgical Associates, P.C. - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
               Finally, petitioner invokes section 7522, which, among other           
          things, states that deficiency notices in income tax cases “shall           
          describe the basis for, and identify the amounts (if any) of, the           
          tax due”.  The notice sets forth deficiencies in tax and, as                
          noted in the preceding paragraph, describes the basis for that              
          portion of the proposed deficiencies attributable to the                    
          principal adjustments as petitioner’s failure to establish that             
          the disallowed amounts were for officers’ compensation.                     
          Respondent has complied with section 7522.                                  
               F.  Conclusion                                                         
               Respondent has not raised a new matter.  Petitioner bears              
          the burden of proof.                                                        
          II. Deductibility of Payments to Shareholder Surgeons                       
               A.  Introduction                                                       
               Petitioner, a cash method taxpayer, paid its four                      
          shareholder surgeons $1,300,231 and $1,528,125 during 1994 and              
          1995, respectively, and deducted such amounts (the return                   
          amounts) as officers’ compensation on its Federal income tax                
          returns for such years.  After initially disallowing $598,710 and           
          $805,469 of such deductions, respondent now agrees that                     
          petitioner may deduct $1,159,455 and $1,508,675 for 1994 and                
          1995, respectively, as compensation for services.  That leaves              
          for our decision respondent’s disallowance of deductions for                








Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011