- 43 -
At any rate, Mr. von Paraski’s testimony sheds no light on the
Central Bank’s substantially inconsistent behavior in erroneously
reporting to the foreign lenders that it continued to “receive” a
nonexistent “pecuniary benefit” in connection with its post-June 28,
1985, interest remittances to them. See supra note 20.
21(...continued)
A. Yes, I do.
Q. If you assume that the pecuniary benefit
reduced the amount of taxes that were collected, are
you aware of any other type of transaction that
resulted in a partial or total refund of the tax
amounts paid by the Central Bank on the restructured
debt?
A. No, I have no knowledge of that.
Q. To your knowledge, other than in the case of
the pecuniary benefit, were there any accounting
entries made that negated, eliminated or reduced Banco
do Brasil’s collection of taxes from the Central Bank?
A. No, I have no knowledge.
Page: Previous 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011