Estate of Marvin M. Schwan - Page 1
















                                 T.C. Memo. 2001-174                                  


                               UNITED STATES TAX COURT                                


             ESTATE OF MARVIN M. SCHWAN, DECEASED, LAWRENCE A. BURGDORF,              
                        SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner v.                          
                    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent                      

           THE MARVIN M. SCHWAN FOUNDATION, f.k.a. THE KING’S FOUNDATION,             
            TRANSFEREE OF A TRANSFEREE OF THE ESTATE OF MARVIN M. SCHWAN,             
              DECEASED, ALFRED PAUL G. SCHWAN AND LAWRENCE A. BURGDORF,               
              TRUSTEES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,               
                                     Respondent                                       
               Docket Nos. 21554-97, 21555-97.         Filed July 13, 2001.           

                    At the time of his death, D owned two-thirds of                   
               the voting and nonvoting shares in SSE, a closely held                 
               corporation.  D’s estate plan provided for the                         
               distribution of such shares to a charitable foundation                 
               and for the subsequent redemption by SSE of certain of                 
               the “securities” as defined in a redemption agreement.                 
               The dispute between the parties in these cases centers                 
               on the valuation of D’s SSE stock for purposes of                      
               computing the gross estate and the allowable charitable                
               deduction under Federal tax laws.  On petitioners’                     
               motion for summary judgment and respondent’s cross-                    
               motion for partial summary judgment, held:                             
                    (1) Because of potential impediments under State                  
               law relating to stockholder rights, an alleged power on                





Page:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011