- 10 - Questions and controversies have arisen between counsel for the Foundation and counsel for the Company regarding the interpretation of * * * the Redemption Agreement. One interpretation would require the Company to purchase, and the Foundation to sell, all of the Shares. Another interpretation would require the Company to purchase, and the Foundation to sell, only the voting shares. The Foundation and the Company understand that it is uncertain how a court would resolve the varying interpretations of the Redemption Agreement. The instrument then provided that the Foundation would sell, and SSE would purchase, all of the shares, both voting and nonvoting, at an initial purchase price of $869,450,800. Also on August 4, 1994, decedent’s Federal estate tax return was signed by Lawrence, Mark, and Paul. The return was received by respondent on August 10, 1994. Therein, decedent’s SSE stock was valued at $869,450,800 in his gross estate, and a charitable deduction was taken in that same amount for the bequest of the shares to the Foundation. Similarly, the above-referenced redemption transaction was completed on August 23, 1994, with the Foundation receiving cash and a note totaling $869,450,800. After the foregoing events, in May of 1995, Lorrie, Mark, David, and Paul, individually and as parents of decedent’s grandchildren, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota against SSE, the Foundation, Alfred, and Lawrence. In their amended complaint, the plaintiffs brought numerous direct and derivative claims based principally on the contention that, under the Redemption Agreement, “Schwan’s was toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011