- 2 - the part of the foundation to recapitalize SSE after D’s death and convert all nonvoting shares to voting shares is an insufficient basis on which to conclude, as a matter of law, that the value of the stock must necessarily be identical for gross estate and charitable deduction purposes. (2) D’s voting and nonvoting shares in SSE must be valued for gross estate purposes as a unitary, two- thirds interest, unrestricted by the terms of the redemption agreement. The requirement under D’s estate plan that the SSE shares be distributed to the foundation, and that certain shares be redeemed by SSE, did not affect the value of the shares in the gross estate. (3) The redemption agreement is ambiguous as to whether it required redemption of only the voting shares, as opposed to both the voting and nonvoting stock. (4) The charitable deduction available to D’s estate must be reduced by the burden of taxes and administrative expenses, and a bonus received by the estate after D’s death cannot be taken into account in calculating such tax and expense burden. Larry R. Henneman and Ann B. Burns, for petitioner in docket No. 21554-97. Joseph M. Hassett, George H. Mernick III, and Albert W. Turnbull, for petitioner in docket No. 21555-97. Lawrence C. Letkewicz, Marjory A. Gilbert, and William G. Bissell, for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011