- 10 - entitled to exclude any income for 1995 through 1997 because his tax home was not in a foreign country, but in a territory of the United States, and because he was not a bona fide resident of a specified possession as defined in section 931(c). In the notices of deficiency, respondent also made certain computational adjustments to itemized deductions resulting from the adjustments to income. Robert J. Haessly Haessly resided on Johnston Island when he filed the petition in his case. He was assigned to the JACADS project for the period March 9, 1994, through at least October 31, 1997. On his return for 1995, Haessly reported the following wages from Raytheon, income from other sources, and adjusted gross income (not including any exclusions from income under sections 931 or 911): Income from Adjusted Year Wages other sources gross income 1995 $95,654 $1,692 1$85,346 1Haessly also claimed a $12,000 adjustment to income for alimony paid. Subsequently, Haessly filed a Form 1040X for 1995 on which he claimed he was entitled to a refund of $17,816 because he could exclude $95,654 from gross income for that year since he was “A BONA FIDE RESIDENT OF U.S. POSSESSION JOHNSTON ISLAND”. With the Form 1040X, Haessly included a Form 4563, Exclusion ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011