John D. Spivey and Pamela K. Spivey - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          deficiency was mailed to petitioners, and (2) any notice of                 
          deficiency mailed to petitioners was not mailed to them at their            
          last known address.  Respondent moved to dismiss this case for              
          lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the petition was not                
          timely filed pursuant to section 6213.1                                     
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
               For the six-year period preceding the date of the hearing on           
          the parties’ cross-motions, including the date on which the                 
          petition was filed, petitioners John D. Spivey (Mr. Spivey) and             
          Pamela K. Spivey (Ms. Spivey) resided at 4425 Northside Drive,              
          Atlanta, Georgia 30327.                                                     
               Mr. Spivey, who is president of Perimeter Bob Cat, Inc.                
          (Perimeter), and Ms. Spivey filed a joint Form 1040, U.S. Indi-             
          vidual Income Tax Return, for taxable year 1997 with the Internal           
          Revenue Service Center in Chamblee, Georgia.  Perimeter timely              
          filed Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return (corporate              
          return), for its taxable year ended January 31, 1997.                       
               At all relevant times, Nancy Runyan (Ms. Runyan), who was a            
          member of respondent’s quality measurement staff,2 was a senior             
          reviewer and a notice-of-deficiency coordinator in respondent’s             


               1All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in            
          effect at all relevant periods.                                             
               2Around the mid-1980's, respondent’s quality measurement               
          staff was known as respondent’s review staff.                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011