- 34 - factor in disallowing deductions and credits, section 6659 is applicable. See Merino v. Commissioner, 196 F.3d 147 (3d Cir. 1999), affg. T.C. Memo. 1997-385; Zfass v. Commissioner, 118 F.3d 184 (4th Cir. 1997), affg. T.C. Memo. 1996-167; Illes v. Commissioner, 982 F.2d 163 (6th Cir. 1992), affg. T.C. Memo. 1991-449; Gilman v. Commissioner, 933 F.2d 143, 151 (2d Cir. 1991), affg. T.C. Memo. 1989-684; Massengill v. Commissioner, 876 F.2d 616 (8th Cir. 1989), affg. T.C. Memo. 1988-427. Petitioners’ reliance on Gainer v. Commissioner, supra, and Todd v. Commissioner, supra, ignores that this Court as well as the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, the court to which appeals in these cases lie, has held that “When an underpayment stems from disallowed depreciation deductions or investment credit due to lack of economic substance, the deficiency is attributable to overstatement of value, and subject to the penalty under section 6659.” Massengill v. Commissioner, supra at 619-620. We also find that the facts in these cases are distinguishable from the facts in Gainer v. Commissioner, supra, Todd v. Commissioner, supra, and McCrary v. Commissioner, supra. In Gainer and Todd, it was found that a valuation overstatement did not contribute to an underpayment of taxes. In those cases, the underpayments were due exclusively to the fact that the property in each case had not been placed in service. In McCrary, the underpayments were deemed to result from aPage: Previous 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011