- 104 - interests in the True companies, and lent to relatives and the family businesses. These facts indicate that Dave True exerted significant control over the True children’s investments in the True companies. He determined the extent of their ownership, the timing of their acquisitions, and the methods of payment for the children’s debt and equity interests. We conclude that Dave True’s control over the means of conveying ownership to the children also allowed him unilaterally to determine the terms of the buy-sell agreements. The specific terms of the buy-sell agreements also reflected Dave True’s dominance over their creation. For instance, key provisions restricting transfers to outsiders and setting the transfer price at book value were included in the earliest buy- sell agreements between Dave and Jean True. Similar versions of those same provisions were incorporated into all subsequent buy- sell agreements with the True children. Moreover, Dave True’s imposition of the active participation requirements was actuated by his strong personal bias against passive ownership. While the True children may have understood and even agreed with their father’s reasons for imposing these requirements, it is clear that he had unfettered ability to do so, which he exercised, without the need for negotiations. It also follows from the events surrounding the sale of Tamma Hatten’s interests in the True companies that there was aPage: Previous 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011