- 99 - fails to satisfy the second prong of the Lauder II test because it was not equally binding during life and at death. C. Were Agreements Entered Into for Bona Fide Business Reasons? The buy-sell agreements in these cases were adopted and maintained to ensure continued family ownership and control of the True Companies. Dave True’s experiences of owning and operating businesses with outsiders (and then having to buy them out) motivated him to use buy-sell provisions (even when Jean True was his only co-owner) to restrict a related owner’s ability to sell outside the family. As previously stated, courts consistently have recognized the goal of maintaining exclusive family control over a business to be a bona fide business purpose. See supra p. 71. By maintaining family control and ownership, Dave True was able to continue his policy of channeling profits from the True companies into True Oil to fund the costs of searching for additional reserves through exploratory drilling. In addition, the buy-sell agreements were used to secure active participation from owners of the True family businesses, because Dave True feared that passive owners would not share his long-term vision for the success and perpetuation of the True companies. Under the buy-sell agreements, an owner who with his or her spouse ceased to devote all or a substantial part of his or her time to the business would be required to sell his or her interest in thePage: Previous 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011