Estate of H.A. True, Jr. - Page 196




                                       - 269 -                                        
              After computing the total value of land and improvements                
          under the cost approach, Mr. Hall then reduced this value by a              
          20-percent size adjustment.  Relying on market data, Mr. Hall               
          concluded that large or noncontiguous parcels of land generally             
          sold for lower prices per acre.  The majority of the available              
          data used in the cost approach related to sales of relatively               
          small parcels of land (generally less than 20,000 deeded acres).            
          However, True Ranches’ land holdings consisted of large, mostly             
          noncontiguous parcels (approximately 265,000 total deeded acres).           
          Thus, Mr. Hall applied the 20-percent size adjustment to                    
          eliminate this disparity.                                                   
              To check the reasonableness of the size adjustment, Mr. Hall            
          compared the computed per acre value (after size adjustment) of             
          True Ranches’ largest parcel (Plains Rangeland--183,990 deeded              
          acres) to the three largest actual sales for which data was                 
          available (each comprising over 30,000 deeded acres) and                    
          concluded that the per acre values were within a reasonable range           
          of each other.  To further support his discount, Mr. Hall cited a           
          publication prepared by the University of Wyoming, which stated             
          that in the mid-1990's, ranches of 600 animal units sold for 16             
          percent less than ranches with 300 to 400 animal units.  True               
          Ranches’ estimated capacity was 12,500 animal units.  Finally,              
          Mr. Hall testified that the 20-percent size adjustment did not              
          represent a discount for lack of marketability of the land and              
          improvements.                                                               





Page:  Previous  259  260  261  262  263  264  265  266  267  268  269  270  271  272  273  274  275  276  277  278  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011