Estate of H.A. True, Jr. - Page 201




                                       - 273 -                                        
          controlling value for the interest valued as of Dave True’s death           
          was $45,297,509.                                                            
                      e. Court’s Analysis                                             
              The positions of the parties and the Court’s determinations             
          of the marketable minority values of True Ranches’ total equity             
          at each of the valuation dates are summarized infra pp. 278-279.            
              We accept the agreement of the parties that controlling                 
          equity value on a net asset value basis was $41,003,000 as of               
          January 1, 1993, and $45,297,509 as of June 4 and June 30, 1994.            
              However, we reject the parties’ proposed minority discounts.            
          Mr. Kimball derived a 25-percent minority discount from studies             
          of premiums offered during tenders for control of publicly traded           
          companies.  He found that the observed average control premiums             
          of 30 to 40 percent translated into minority discounts of 23 to             
          29 percent.  We find this analysis to be unhelpful because a                
          general partner in True Ranches would exert more control over the           
          business than a shareholder in a comparable public company.  The            
          True Ranches partnership agreement required the partners to                 
          manage jointly the partnership’s affairs.  Thus, each partner had           
          an equal vote in (among other things) appointing management,                
          setting business policies, making distributions, buying and                 
          selling assets, and amending the partnership agreement.  A                  
          minority shareholder could not exercise equivalent control over a           
          public company.                                                             







Page:  Previous  263  264  265  266  267  268  269  270  271  272  273  274  275  276  277  278  279  280  281  282  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011