- 6 - disallowed Schedule C expenses which represent pre-incorporation expenditures. A. Disregarding the Corporate Entity Generally, an individual is not entitled to deductions for business expenses of a corporation because the trade or business of a corporation is considered separate and distinct from the trade or business of the individual. See Moline Properties, Inc. v. Commissioner, 319 U.S. 436, 438-439 (1943); Deputy v. duPont, 308 U.S. 488, 495 (1940); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 442 (1934). Petitioner argues that this Court should disregard Export’s corporate form. A taxpayer is generally free to organize his affairs as he chooses, but a taxpayer must accept the tax consequences of those choices. See Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co., 417 U.S. 134 (1974). Once a taxpayer has made his bed, he must lie in it. See Hagist Ranch, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1960-206, affd. 295 F.2d 351 (7th Cir. 1961). “Where the taxpayer, for business purposes of his own, adopts the corporate form for carrying on a business, the choice of corporate advantage to do business requires acceptance of the tax disadvantages.” Skarda v. Commissioner, 250 F.2d 429, 434 (10th Cir. 1957), affg. 27 T.C. 137 (1956). We will not disregard the corporate entity so long as the corporation has a valid business purpose or the corporationPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011