- 8 - that Export was a strong, sturdy business. Further, according to the articles of incorporation, Export was formed to sell American manufactured products abroad and to enter into agreements with manufacturers and distributors. We are further satisfied that Export engaged in a sufficient level of business activity. Petitioner held himself out to the public as the president of Export, and petitioner attempted to secure sales and purchases under the corporate name. Petitioner sent several letters to various distributors and purchasers on the Export letterhead in an effort to create business. In fact, Export had one sale, although the sale was subsequently cancelled. Export’s level of business activity for 1996 and 1997 was such that we will not disregard the corporate form. Petitioner contends that the corporate form should be disregarded because he spent only 3 to 4 hours per week on the business. Petitioner, now recognizing it is advantageous to disregard the corporate entity, testified that he engaged in little or no sales activity, which is inconsistent with the position in his Federal tax returns. For example, petitioner claimed on those returns that he drove a total of almost 29,000 miles in 1996 and 1997 for business purposes. We are not required to rely upon petitioner’s self-serving testimony. See Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 219-220 (1992);Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011