Anand K. Verma - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
          of the personal property acquired for use in an active trade or             
          business.  See sec. 179(b)(1), (c), and (d)(1).  To qualify as a            
          valid section 179 election, the election must specify the items             
          to which the election applies, and the election must be made on             
          the taxpayer’s return.  See sec. 179(c)(1).  “Entitlement to the            
          benefits of section 179 is not automatic.  It requires an                   
          affirmative election be attached to the original return or to a             
          timely filed amended return.”  Starr v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          1995-190, affd. without published opinion 99 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir.            
          1996); see Patton v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 206 (2001); Shores v.           
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-193; sec. 1.179-5(a), Income Tax              
          Regs.  Petitioner failed to make a section 179 election on his              
          return, and, therefore, he is not entitled to a current deduction           
          for his facsimile machines.5                                                
               7.  Travel and Meals                                                   
               Petitioner deducted $1,600 in 1996 for travel and meals.               
          Petitioner testified that these expenses related to a trip to               
          India on which he conducted business but did not have business              
          meetings.  Petitioner did not provide receipts or additional                
          facts regarding the trip to India.                                          



               5    Respondent allowed a depreciation deduction of $138 for           
          1996 for the facsimile machines.  Petitioner did not present any            
          evidence challenging the amount of the allowed deduction or the             
          depreciation schedule.  As a result, petitioner is deemed to have           
          conceded this issue.  See Rules 142(a), 149(b); Burris v.                   
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-49.                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011