- 18 - costs under section 263A its costs of $17,532 for labor and materials, and it may not reduce gross income by $17,532 in 1994. We conclude that AIM had cost of goods sold of $85,883 for 1994.5 D. Labor by High School Students Respondent contends that petitioner had constructive dividends of $442 in 1994, $40 in 1995, and $243 in 1996 and that AIM may not deduct these amounts because petitioners did not substantiate the amounts petitioner paid to high school students to maintain the lawn and premises at the Whittington property in the summers of the years in issue. We disagree. Petitioner credibly testified, and corroborated by contemporaneous records, that he paid high school students $442 in 1994, $40 in 1995, and $243 in 1996 to maintain AIM’s premises. Respondent points out that in Park v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-343, we held that the taxpayer could not deduct labor expenses because he had no records to substantiate those payments. We distinguish Park because, here, the contemporaneous expense reports that petitioner used to claim reimbursement corroborate his testimony. The issue in Park was whether to estimate under Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540, 544 (2d Cir. 1930), the amount the taxpayer paid for office help. Here, we know the exact amounts of the labor expenses because petitioners 5 Respondent concedes that AIM may reduce its 1995 gross receipts by $17,532 for costs of goods sold.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011